- Complexity: Advanced
- Deployment: HeyQuinn recommended
The problem
Enterprise database migrations from commercial databases to open source cloud native targets are large, manual engagements that many organizations defer. Engineers must inventory every stored procedure, translate the logic by hand, validate each translation, and produce a report the business can act on. The estimated labor cost of that work is often the reason a migration never starts.
- Every stored procedure must be read and translated by hand before it can move to a new dialect
- Teams cannot easily tell which procedures are still in use before spending time translating them
- Validation of translated logic happens late, after most of the manual work is already done
- Executive stakeholders need a readable summary of scope and risk, which someone must assemble separately
The solution
A sequential pipeline of agents inventories the database estate, translates each stored procedure, validates the translation, and produces a business ready summary, while engineers keep control of what ships.
- Parses the full stored procedure inventory from SQL Server to establish scope
- Translates each procedure's dialect toward the target format for Aurora PostgreSQL
- Validates each translation against guardrails before it is marked complete
- Routes work between agents and selects the appropriate model tier for each task through AWS Bedrock
- Generates an executive ready assessment report summarizing scope, risk and dead code found
Where people stay in control
- An engineer reviews and approves the migration plan before anything moves to production
- Guardrail validation runs on every translated procedure before it is marked complete
- Engagement teams review the assessment report before it goes to the client
Systems and data
The workflow reads schema and stored procedure exports from SQL Server, writes translated procedures toward Aurora PostgreSQL, and runs model calls through AWS Bedrock for parsing and synthesis tasks.
- SQL Server
- Aurora PostgreSQL
- AWS Bedrock
Results
- Reduced estimated engineering hours from 2600 to approximately 220 on a 2500 procedure estate in the documented deployment
- Found that 74 percent of procedures were dead code that manual teams would otherwise have translated in the documented deployment
- Migration speed improved between 58 percent and 82 percent across four documented engagements
- Engineering triage time for cloud operations remediation dropped 70 percent and mean time to resolution fell 40 percent in the documented deployment
Why HeyQuinn is recommended
The workflow coordinates several agents with model tier routing across a full engagement and runs inside customer cloud accounts, so persistent monitoring and governance across the pipeline argue for HeyQuinn recommended deployment.
Frequently asked questions
Does AI translate the entire database migration without review?
No. Agents parse, translate and validate stored procedures, but an engineer reviews and approves the migration plan before anything moves to production.
How does the pipeline reduce migration cost?
It automates inventory, translation and validation of stored procedures and identifies dead code that would otherwise be translated unnecessarily, cutting estimated engineering hours.
What databases does this apply to?
The documented pipeline translates from a commercial database such as SQL Server to an open source cloud native target such as Aurora PostgreSQL.